Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Melila Purcell (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 08:43, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Melila Purcell (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Never played a game in the NFL, college career isn't enough to pass GNG. The news sources in the link above are only routine coverage for an athlete, nothing to establish notability. Wizardman 23:21, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete the notability misses the mark for an encyclapedia, but I started an article on the athelete at the American Football Wiki at Wikia ( has over 11,000 pages it's a great home for this content ). Bryce Carmony (talk) 02:07, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. lavender|(formerlyHMSSolent)|lambast 02:07, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Mellowed Fillmore (talk) 02:10, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep that was tricky, I did a quick review and didn't find much in current news. But then I saw that we did this two years ago. Apparently I saw something then that I didn't find so quickly now. I'm willing to trust myself from a few years ago. Once notable, always notable.--Paul McDonald (talk) 15:34, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Except notability interpretations and guidelines do change, so surviving one deletion attempt does not mean automatic notability at all future discussions. 204.126.132.231 (talk) 15:56, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:58, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.