- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Non-notable as per WP:MUSIC (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 12:22, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Me Vs. You (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Demos are assumed non-notable per WP:MUSIC —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 23:53, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:29, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, per nom. --Nuujinn (talk) 00:11, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - to correct a misinterpretation/assumption in the nomination. The guideline WP:MUSIC says that demos are general not notable; however, they may be notable if they have significant independent coverage in reliable sources. Regards, SunCreator (talk) 00:09, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. SunCreator is right that it isn't assumed not to be notable... but this one isn't. No sources, few google hits and relatively little content bar the track listing. Alzarian16 (talk) 11:42, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.