Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maximillian Laumeister

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. WP:NPASR per low participation herein. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:35, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Maximillian Laumeister

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I find only one source, one of the ones cited in this article, with any substantial coverage of this person. The product might be notable, but it doesn't appear that he is, with most mentions of him doing no more than identifying him as the creator. Largoplazo (talk) 19:12, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Just found and added a quote along with another secondary source (Co.Exist) to the article/references. K.Koopa (talk) 01:36, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- The source, in discussing "Listen to Bitcoin", mentions him only to say that he's the creator and to quote a comment from him about the source's main topic. The only thing the source says about him is that he's "an undergrad studying game design at UC Santa Cruz". This isn't substantial coverage of him, as called for by WP:GNG. Largoplazo (talk) 03:16, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:19, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:39, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:18, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:18, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:18, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:47, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.