Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mashinky (video game)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  10:23, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mashinky (video game) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Topic has no coverage whatsoever from reliable secondary sources. 0 hits from reliable video game source search. The1337gamer (talk) 14:23, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. The1337gamer (talk) 14:24, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • I found old information (wrong game name) on list of game developers and fix it, than I also fill some at least minimal info about myself as a user and game developer and about the game Mashinky I am working on. My profil was "speedy deleted" and now also info about game Mashinky? It is not promotional, it is just very basic info for those who are looking for it. The page about me was just about me, nothing promotional or whatever (I've used page about another well known game developer as a template), but I don't care any more, just delete everything I've fixed or inserted including my profile, I will quit from wikipedia either. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JanZeleny (talkcontribs) 14:49, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
We only write articles on games that have significant coverage in multiple reliable, independent sources. (?) Those links will tell you more about the WP notability guidelines. Hope to see you back in the future, but our Wikipedia:Conflict of interest guidelines encourage you to edit articles with other subjects. czar 15:54, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.