Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maryann Krieglstein
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗plicit 23:39, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Maryann Krieglstein (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:PROF. Likely WP:VANITY page. jps (talk) 18:00, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and Social science. jps (talk) 18:00, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Illinois. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:01, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. TJMSmith (talk) 19:47, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
I'm not voting since this is my mother. I've had my COI announced on the top of my user page for over a decade. I haven't edited this page since 2016 and have no plans of violating COI and editing ever again. This article went through peer review at Articles for Creation, as noted on the talk page. I did not move it to the main space. Finally, are Maryann's google scholar results. Her seminal research has been cited 60 times. Her co-authorship has been cited 128. Dkriegls (talk to me!) 21:34, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
- Weak delete or draftify. Sadly, I don't think WP:PROF or WP:GNG is met. Awards and recognition are very local. Perhaps, if no better sources are found (my BEFORE did not help), we can draftify it rather than delete it. Sources may appear, eventually, and restoring a userpace draft is easier than going through a REFUND. And I presume User:Dkriegls would not mind hosting this article in their userspace for indefinite time? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 02:22, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- I've spent a good amount of time on Wikipedia trying to save/add biographies of female scientists and artists. Happy to add my mom to the list (link). I'd be grateful if you could provide some guidance on what you think would improve the article. Dkriegls (talk to me!) 20:39, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
- Delete but her presence might be maintained on WP if one could use her written materials in articles such as Violence against women. That would be more likely to lead people to her work than an article under her name, IMO. Lamona (talk) 09:41, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. Seems to be part of a WALL of the creator's parents (see also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Werner Krieglstein and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Transcendental perspectivism). Unfortunately, the scholarly work of this person (a few journal articles with a grand total citation count of around 130) and the academic awards (mostly internal from her community college) fall very far short of typical PROF criteria. 128.252.154.2 (talk) 00:06, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.