- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. seicer | talk | contribs 20:27, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Mary Boone (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Procedural nomination; article was speedy deleted under A7 criteria, and subsequently contested at DRV. See Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2008 September 7 The deleting administrator has agreed to the deletion being overturned and the article being listed here for discussion. Jerry delusional ¤ kangaroo 16:59, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Dealer and gallery central to 1980's art market. Found and promoted many important contemporary artists. I will expand the article and add references accordingly.--Knulclunk (talk) 19:25, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Did a total rewrite. Feel free to expand.--Knulclunk (talk) 04:53, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep there's enough here from which to build an article. TravellingCari 21:21, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Museums and libraries-related deletion discussions. -- TravellingCari 21:22, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. —freshacconci talktalk 00:03, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep New York cover story, cited centrality to 80s art market and per Knulclunk and TravellingCari.John Z (talk) 23:21, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Notability is without question. This article needs improvement and references, but there are plenty of those available. freshacconci talktalk 00:01, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I agree with speedy keep. --Tone 07:29, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and rewrite/update/etc. If "notes" are meant to be "references" we need to list them as such but, there does seem to be enough out there to show notability and verify. Jasynnash2 (talk) 12:56, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Done :) --Knulclunk (talk) 15:55, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, seems to meet all the criteria. Stifle (talk) 09:39, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy keep since it's snowing.--S Marshall Talk/Cont 09:41, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.