Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Martin Martinez

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Missvain (talk) 23:52, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

Martin Martinez

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Martin Martinez (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I believe this is a case of WP:TOOSOON. He's been in a few TV shows and movies but not a major role. The sources are either primary, or of the "local actor goes to Hollywood" type. ... discospinster _talk 14:05, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. ... discospinster _talk 14:05, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. ... discospinster _talk 14:05, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:19, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:20, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

• Delete- WP:TOOSOON, currently fails WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG. The subject has not played significant roles in multiple notable films and television shows. I see lack of coverage in multiple reliable sources that are independent of the subject. Most sources used in the article are questionable except perhaps VoyageLA source, but it is an interview with the subject and does not include any commentary from the interviewer which makes it neither secondary nor independent, and cannot be used to demonstrate notability. --Ashleyyoursmile! 14:34, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.