Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marita Black

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 03:12, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Marita Black

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article used to have a lot more content but it got trimmed, presumably due to being badly sourced and violating our WP:BLP policy. Black is potentially non-notable and does not apparently meet WP:NMUSICIAN, WP:NACTOR or WP:GNG.

Looking at this old revision, we know that she was in a band called Lust Pollution, but I'm not seeing much in terms of WP:RS coverage about that band, not enough to make her notable in her own right as the singer anyway. Her acting career seems to have only one role that could be argued as significant; a teacher in one series of Grange Hill. She does not have the multiple roles required.

Her work in the field of hypnotherapy also doesn't seem to be enough. Only passing mentions in a newspaper search. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:22, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:22, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:22, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:22, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:22, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: per nom, fails WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG CommanderWaterford (talk) 19:54, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as there is a lack of substantial coverage in multiple reliable sources so that WP:Basic is not passed at this time. Also only one prominent role so does not meet the criteria of WP:NACTOR in my view, Atlantic306 (talk) 00:20, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.