Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marhari

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Rhovanion. Non-admin closure. Jujutacular ^T · C 00:12, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Marhari

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A Lord of the Rings character that is so minor the article has been an orphan for four years. Ridernyc (talk) 00:01, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cast out beyond the walls of the world this refugee from an appendix. Clarityfiend (talk) 00:58, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:00, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect/Merge to Rhovanion. 70.29.210.242 (talk) 04:41, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Rhovanion. I don't see why deletion is necessary when a redirect will do as fine and still allows the name to show up in categories (Category:Middle-earth Men). Uthanc (talk) 06:35, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Because it's non-notable, unreferenced and not likely to ever be a search term. Ridernyc (talk) 10:39, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It's likely to be searched because it's Tolkien. Some will inevitably treat Wikipedia like a Tolkien encyclopedia site. I'm not saying we should keep every single scrap of info but there's a place for everything no matter how small. Uthanc (talk) 12:26, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

redirect at least very named tolkien character, even in the backstory, should be included, at least as a redirect. There's no possible reason why a redirect would be harmful. it will help some people. Redirect are an easy compromise in situations like this; if the information is not in the suitable article already, add it--that makes it a merge, not a redirect. DGG ( talk ) 19:36, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect. Per DGG.--Epeefleche (talk) 10:38, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.