- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep. (aeropagitica) (talk) 13:14, 4 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Yet another election candidation/local councillor/internal party office holder. Timrollpickering 13:25, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep - I am normally inclined to delete these, but James has a relatively high profile as a vice-chairman of the party and symbol of the new breed of A-lister Tory the leader is hoping for. Martín (saying/doing) 13:53, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep High profile candidate, and likely to get a shot at a safe seat next time round. Catchpole 18:06, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Local councillors are notable. With the recent "A-list" discussion we will have to reinstate the page soon enough if we delete it now. – Kaihsu 08:19, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - local councillors are most definitely not notable. The guidelines are, national, state, provincial etc but not municipal. BlueValour 04:14, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.