Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Malaria and the Caribbean

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. -- Ed (Edgar181) 18:48, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Malaria and the Caribbean

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced personal essay on the topic. This is likely a notable topic, but there's nothing here that would be salvaged to build an article on the topic. I think a clean start per WP:TNT may be best. Ajpolino (talk) 21:36, 12 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Ajpolino (talk) 21:36, 12 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Caribbean-related deletion discussions. Ajpolino (talk) 21:36, 12 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Notable topic but needs references such as McNeill, J. R. (2010-01-11). Mosquito Empires: Ecology and War in the Greater Caribbean, 1620–1914. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 9781139484503. and "CARPHA urges region to deal seriously to eradicate mosquitoes". Jamaica Observer. May 14, 2019. Retrieved 2019-06-12. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 22:13, 12 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per WP:IMPERFECT. WP:STUBIFY if necessary as preferred WP:ATD. ~Kvng (talk) 14:51, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, on the basis of the previous two comments. By the way, Ajpolino, I'm not sure why you wanted to delete (rather than improve) an article given that you agree that the topic is notable. Alarichall (talk) 19:09, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep,I agree the topic is notable, needs some more sources. Alex-h (talk) 20:40, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Notable topic but needs some references and sources. --SalmanZ (talk) 21:58, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: I think we have a consensus that the topic is notable, but needs work. - Ret.Prof (talk) 14:07, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.