Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/M N Rai

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Noting that while the original nominator has withdrawn the request, there is still a consensus amongst the other three participants for "Delete". Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 06:10, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

M N Rai

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

KCVelaga _{☚╣✉╠☛} 15:10, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination Sources Found KCVelaga _{☚╣✉╠☛} 10:13, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 19:14, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 05:25, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Krishna Chaitanya Velaga, it helps to have a summary of why the article should be deleted even if it seems obvious. My searches found several results of course with News and browser but he would be best mentioned elsewhere. SwisterTwister talk 05:30, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Not senior enough for inherent notability and his medal is well down the list - third-level at the highest. Doesn't meet WP:SOLDIER in any way. -- Necrothesp (talk) 12:49, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

QUESTION: if the nominator withdraws the nom, do the votes tallied count? Is this AFD over? Just curious. Quis separabit? 18:40, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Answer - [email protected] - Nope nom can only withdraw if there's either no !votes or Keep !votes, If there's even one delete !vote it still can't be closed as withdrawn :), Hope that helps :) –Davey2010^Talk 23:48, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:40, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:34, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - searches did not turn up anything to show this meets the notability criteria. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 02:55, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.