Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Los Fantasmas

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Menudo. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades^Godric 05:22, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Los Fantasmas

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article has cited no sources since December 2009. There is also no evidence of notabilty and no proof that the album was recorded at Abbey Road Studios in 1976. DBZFan30 (talk) 03:02, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. DBZFan30 (talk) 03:03, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. DBZFan30 (talk) 03:03, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Latin America-related deletion discussions. DBZFan30 (talk) 03:03, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Puerto Rico-related deletion discussions. DBZFan30 (talk) 03:03, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Lots of bands have pages like that for every album. The low quality of the page is not evidence for its lack of notability. Power~enwiki (talk) 02:16, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thats not a valid reason for keeping an article. See WP:OSE. Sergecross73 msg me 03:18, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The page has existed for over a decade. Why should it be deleted now? Should the thousands of other albums with pages in a similar state be deleted as well? Power~enwiki (talk) 04:52, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

As the nomination says - it's unsourced, making it fail Wikipedia's standard for whether or not something should have its own article. How long it has existed, and how bad it is in comparison to other articles, is irrelevent. If you want to provide a valid argument for keeping the article, you want to form your argument around it passing the WP:GNG or WP:NMUSIC. Sergecross73 msg me 10:50, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 04:52, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Menudo, per usual practice when albums are not notable but artists are. I couldn't find any sources to indicate the album is actually notable enough to have a standalone article. Even es.wiki and it.wiki don't have any sources listed. Google search turned up nothing, even in Spanish, and neither did Google books. We can always un-redirect if somebody locates a source somewhere. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 17:59, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.