Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of fantasy Clichés
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. If an editor is interested in merging the content, just let me know and I'll restore the history. Regards, Arbitrarily0 (talk) 02:08, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- List of fantasy Clichés (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Random selection, original research. Unsourced and some of the entries really would have to be sourced (e.g. that the damsel in distress is typically a princess.) Also, we already have Category:Clichés. Schuhpuppe (talk) 00:06, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge. With Fantasy tropes and conventions and please do the research and get those cites. I have added the appropriate template on the article. patsw (talk) 00:45, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, because it's all original research. There's nothing to merge. - Richard Cavell (talk) 11:56, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete As Richard Cavell said, as it is all original research there is nothing to merge. The really obvious mentions are already included in the fantasy tropes and conventions and most of the rest of the list is only relevant to fairy tales, myths and legends, which are normally seen as separate genres and not a part of fantasy. Yoenit (talk) 13:30, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. The creating editor of this article was around for 11 days. If there were timely notice to this newbie, he or she might have been motivated to remedy the article during their period of activity. As it stands now, without a motivated editor to merge and cite, the content is likely to be deleted as WP:NOR. patsw (talk) 16:19, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Yoenit said it well. Deor (talk) 22:56, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete- Yoenit has said almost all that needs to be said. Can we add a line to WP:NOT to the effect that Wikipedia and TvTropes are not the same thing? Reyk YO! 00:39, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:20, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge with Fantasy tropes and conventions as suggested by patsw. Colonel Warden (talk) 07:48, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge as suggested. Bearian (talk) 17:48, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.