Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Bloodborne characters

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 06:35, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

List of Bloodborne characters

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The list of characters is not notable enough to have its own page. Very limited information is provided. AdrianGamer (talk) 04:35, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per what was already said here. —DangerousJXD (talk) 06:26, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as I said in merge discussion, not worth redirecting and a list of only 2 characters with no significant commentary. --The1337gamer (talk) 10:15, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 13:03, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:03, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:03, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The topic of Bloodborne characters lacks significant coverage from reliable, independent sources. (?) It had no dedicated coverage in a video game reliable sources custom Google search—there isn't enough secondary source coverage to justify a dedicated article. The page is better off deleted than redirected and later recreated. Please ping me you find more (non-English and offline) sources. czar ⨹ 21:01, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Character lists tend to fall under WP:GAMECRUFT if not notable enough, and this is no exception. BlookerG ^talk 12:02, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.