Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lexoo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Jovanmilic97 (talk) 10:01, 16 December 2018 (UTC)

Lexoo

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Lexoo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An advertorially toned page on an unremarkable private company. Significant RS coverage not found; what comes up is passing mentions, routine notices, and / or WP:SPIP. Has raised $4M in funding, which is low. Created by Special:Contributions/JDob4 with no other contributions outside this topic. Does not meet WP:NCORP. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:12, 25 November 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:12, 25 November 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:03, 25 November 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:03, 25 November 2018 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ―Abelmoschus Esculentus ^{talk / contribs} 04:37, 2 December 2018 (UTC)

• Keep. Has received sufficient coverage in reliable sources, e.g. [1], [2], [3], [4]. --Michig (talk) 07:48, 9 December 2018 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 09:59, 9 December 2018 (UTC)

• Keep as has received significant coverage in reliable sources as shown above passes WP:CORPDEPTH thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 17:21, 9 December 2018 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.