Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lauren Hopkins

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Clear consensus herein for deletion. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:31, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Lauren Hopkins

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Against Deletion. Sources from Bleacher Report and International Gymnast Magazine added.

Fails WP:GNG and WP:AUTHOR. Sources include links to her Facebook profile. Elgatodegato (talk) 15:43, 5 May 2015 (UTC

Support per nom. There's no independant coverage at all, and all the coverage that there isn't considered reliable. KoshVorlon Rassekali ternii i mlechnye puti 16:21, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not notable and article appears to be written by a 12 year old for a class project ("Hopkins was definitely born on September 29 and it is expected she was born in 1983.") —Мандичка^YO 😜 20:51, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Does not meet WP:BIO. --Inother (talk) 17:24, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:33, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:34, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:34, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:34, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete 'tis the veriest, unsourceable advertising.E.M.Gregory (talk) 18:42, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete There is no significant independent coverage of this person. If the gymternet was/is notable enough for an article, this could be redirected there. 204.126.132.231 (talk) 16:12, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This person merely runs a website about gymnastics. This does not make her noteworthy in any way. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.198.204.192 (talk) 18:41, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The original author has blanked the page, but I declined G7 speedy deletion, because other people have also edited the page. --MelanieN (talk) 21:18, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.