Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laois Senior’A Hurling Championship
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Tone 13:47, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Laois Senior’A Hurling Championship (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No sign of notability. Not only does Google turn up nothing of substance for laois "senior a hurling championship, it turns up little for "senior a hurling championship" altogether. I don't know what "Senior’A Championship" means, but, for hurling, it categorically has almost no coverage. Largoplazo (talk) 22:52, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
I'm wondering whether it qualifies for speedy deletion under WP:CSD G7, as when I arrived at the article, I saw that it had an AFD tag on it that was pointing to the deletion discussion for a different article. I just noticed that that tag was placed there by the article's creator, so perhaps it amounts to deletion requested by author. Largoplazo (talk) 22:55, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. Largoplazo (talk) 22:58, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. Largoplazo (talk) 22:58, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
- Delete for the same reasons as Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laois Intermediate Hurling Championship (3rd nomination). Ajf773 (talk) 23:26, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per nom and Ajf773. Kirbanzo (talk) 23:48, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per everyone; has an improperly-formatted title, but even without such issues it's still non-notable like the other similar pages. I've heard another page similar to this one has been AfD'd multiple times (all either without consensus or a consensus to delete), so at worst maybe salt, but I'm not sure that's necessary. --John M Wolfson (talk) 01:11, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Spleodrach (talk) 14:32, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.