Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LaVerne Ray Fromberg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Carlossuarez46 00:10, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

LaVerne Ray Fromberg

No supported assertions of notability (i.e. no references). Google brings up zero hits. Oli Filth 20:29, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete- Per WP:BIO this person seems to have 'received critical attention'. However this article reeks of POV, and if the author intends to keep it they should definitely get some sources and clean it up. -- Naruttebayo 20:42, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. It makes me very nervous when an article is just one big copy and paste without any attempt to format to Wikipedia.--Truest blue 21:10, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Delete per lack of significant coverage from independent sources. Corpx 01:21, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:BIO without sources. There is always monster.com for his resume.Montco 04:06, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletions. —David Eppstein 15:46, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep as she exhibited at MoMA and the Fulton Gallery in NYC, which was once a big deal, but is not my cuppa tea. No assertion of notability, and Ghits probably won't work, as she's long dead. Any art historians out there? We could use an expert's opinion. Bearian 18:42, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.