- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 05:01, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Kurt Tay (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Notwithstanding serious BLP concerns, the subject simply isn't notable enough to have his own article. A Singaporean Chris Chan, if you will... KINGofLETTUCE 👑 🥬 18:11, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Internet, and Singapore. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:24, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:28, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: Seems to be non-notable as an online personality; coverage is mostly around some charges of distributing not so nice things online [1], I don't find much coverage from before or after this. I don't think that's criminal notability and I don't see general notability, due to the lack of sources. Oaktree b (talk) 00:36, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.