Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Koshti

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Koshta. without prejudice to merging any unduplicated content j⚛e decker ^talk 22:07, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Koshti

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article Koshta is already existing on wiki and Koshti duplicates to the same and is poorly sourced.Either of the two be deleted Mahensingha 20:08, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:33, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:27, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:00, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rcsprinter₁₂₃ (babble) @ 19:01, 21 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

~~Delete~~ : for the obvious reason given above. --Mahensingha 20:31, 21 October 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mahensingha (talk • contribs)
Redirect or merge if they are two ways of spelling the name of the caste. No need to delete. Thincat (talk) 17:49, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
~~Delete~~ : One of the articles Koshti or Koshta needs to be deleted as both have the similar contents that too without reliable references. the references on review reflects something else.--Mahensingha 18:35, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
- Deletion nominators don't get to "!vote" twice. —innotata 16:46, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
As long as the both spellings are used for the caste, there is no need for deletion, and one should be redirected to the other. —innotata 16:44, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.