Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kim Seeling Smith
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:04, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Kim Seeling Smith (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non notable person; entry is one of several along those lines created by the same now-banned account. There do not appear to be any independent sources for the notability of this person. bd2412 T 22:35, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:12, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:12, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: No doubt Ms. Smith is competent in her field, but not notable per Wikipedia guidelines. I see two news references to her, one in passing, one in regards to a personal weight loss story.--Milowent • hasspoken 14:22, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Fails WP:AUTHOR and WP:BK and reads like WP:ADVERT. Qworty (talk) 20:12, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.