Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kim Bergman

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. North America1000 19:10, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kim Bergman (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Supposed brochure article for BLP, for own company. Fails WP:SIGCOV and WP:ACADEMIC scope_creepTalk 14:46, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 15:28, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 15:28, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Psychology-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 15:28, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. TJMSmith (talk) 17:37, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. TJMSmith (talk) 17:38, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. TJMSmith (talk) 17:38, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.