Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Khushi Mukherjee

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 17:12, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Khushi Mukherjee

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This was rejected at WP:AFC by Hatchens as non notable, and then moved by the eponymous creating editor to main space a few minutes later. It has already been draftified once, thus redraftification by me (or others) would be move warring

Fails WP:NACTOR Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 16:49, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 16:49, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: While not directly relevant to the actual nomination, the image in the article is subject to a Wikimedia Commons deletion process because of questionable copyright/permission issues Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 16:52, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nom. -Hatchens (talk) 03:10, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: As per nom - there's an obvious COI here and I haven't seen in any draft the depth of coverage for notability. Given their persistence with the draft, this is obviously where this article would have ended up at some point. Ravensfire (talk) 04:20, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per Revensfire. Bapinghosh (talk) 09:56, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: WP:NACTOR compliance issue raised in initial AfC review has not been sufficiently addressed in current article, notwithstanding the dubious nature of the transition to mainspace. /Tpdwkouaa (talk) 05:16, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Comments at Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Khushi Mukherjee. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 17:23, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
weak keep The sources listed on Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Khushi Mukherjee by the author who is also the subject may pass notability. I'm having trouble evaluating how reliable they are though. Possibly someone familiar with Bollywood reporting and media should look more closely at them. JoshuaZ (talk) 15:08, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@JoshuaZ: Majority of them are sponsored/paid news. They fail WP:NACTOR. That is the reason they are trying to bypass WP:AFC evaluation 2402:3A80:6DE:87AB:C908:B3C5:E35E:6EDD (talk) 14:31, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.