Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Khawaja Reazuddin Atash

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. So Why 12:24, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Khawaja Reazuddin Atash

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No source. Tried to find but nothing came up. He fails WP:GNG and WP:AUTHOR. Greenbörg (talk) 10:57, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:13, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:14, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:16, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:16, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Delete Although he is not notable in english, I am wondering if there are sources in other languages. I am a bit surprised that he does not have articles on WPs in other languages though. No WP:RSs seem to exist in english and there is no evidence that there are sufficient notable sources in other languages.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 02:36, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete found nothing in RS. Have searched in some Urdu sources as well but nothing except this which is not enough. --Saqib (talk) 05:42, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: no significant coverage to show it passes author inclusion criteria. DrStrauss talk 10:40, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.