Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Khamoshiyan Soundtrack
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:42, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
- Khamoshiyan Soundtrack (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No spectacular coverage about this sound-track to deserve a stand-alone article.Usual hype and activity related to release of a Hindi Film.Almost every Bollywood film has their sound-track seperately reviewed.That hardly recommends a stand-alone article for every film-sound-track! Merge and Redirect to film-article sought.Could be covered at ease in a paragraph there.Ping Cyphoidbomb as someone involved in the case. Winged Blades Godric 17:30, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
- Delete: WP:RS not met.-Umair Aj (talk) 17:43, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 18:24, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 18:24, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
- Keep - In-depth coverage of the entire soundtrack added at citation number 2 . The in-depth coverage is provided by India's one of the oldest and reliable news media Times of India.As of now, Notability for a standalone article exists. Further can be improved of needed by the contributors. Anoptimistix (talk) 20:07, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
- Keep as reliable sources have reviewed the soundtrack including Times of India and Rediff as shown in the critical reception of the article, passes WP:GNG Atlantic306 (talk) 14:54, 9 July 2017 (UTC)
- Comment- @Atlantic306: Thanks for sharing your thoughts above mate. But I think you forgot to sign your comment by adding four tidles (~~~~) above.[1]Anoptimistix (talk) 06:11, 9 July 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.