Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kevin Bell (physio)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedily deleted by User:Y, non-admin close.. – ukexpat (talk) 00:51, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Kevin Bell (physio) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested PROD. This unreferenced BLP is about a physical therapist/trainer for a professional football team. I can't find any coverage of him in reliable independent sources that would indicate notability. PDCook (talk) 13:18, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:24, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:24, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. ChrisTheDude (talk) 14:47, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I would say that even the club's first team physio isn't notable (unless of course he's had bucketloads of independent coverage) and this guy isn't even that, he's the youth team physio. I'm sure he does an excellent job with the youngsters, but in the grand scheme of things this is simply not a notable position within football -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 14:50, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: not even close to being notable. As Chris says, I'm sure he's good at what he does but he is a very minor character in the sport. -- BigDom 18:38, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete - per A7, looks obvious to me. Tagging it, though it was already PRODDED. ukexpat (talk) 21:24, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Agree A7, no assertion of notability shown, but as long as we are here, fails WP:GNG and couldn't categorise him under any other criteria to keep.--ClubOranjeT 21:50, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.