Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keeper (Appelt book)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:08, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keeper (Appelt book) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Could not find any notable sources on the internet Skamecrazy123 (talk) 00:13, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I am trying to make this article as acceptable as possible. Please don't delete it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by StarLegacy (talk • contribs) 00:16, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - If you can find some reliable third party sources then please add them. However, the search that I undertook revealed nothing that I would consider notable. --Skamecrazy123 (talk) 00:22, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep I found reviews from Booklist, Kirkus, Kansas City Star, and Publisher's weekly. Appelt is a Newbery Award winner and National Book Award finalist and certainly a notably author by any reasonable measure. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 01:29, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:04, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:04, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and add the reviews. They're the necessary sources. DGG ( talk ) 04:36, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Keep or perhaps merged into the author's article. I could only find a few reviews on the book: [1] [2] [3]. --Odie5533 (talk) 16:38, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.