Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karl von Möller

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Star Mississippi 23:09, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Karl von Möller (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Sources are insufficient in establishing notability, nor could any reliable/ independent sources be found online containing more than just a passing mention. ––– GMH Melbourne (talk) 00:04, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom
AaronVick (talk) 02:42, 2 December 2023 (UTC)(sock strike Liz Read! Talk! 00:36, 9 December 2023 (UTC))[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 00:36, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.