Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kannada Wikipedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 01:34, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kannada Wikipedia

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable version of Wikipedia; the article doesn't include any third-party sources. eh bien mon prince (talk) 01:37, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 03:21, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:32, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Strong keep: Is notable please check there are 38 million speakers and most of the newspapers and articles are not available online (english translated)

there was been even a ten years celebration in local newspaper of kannada wiki

here

proofs of third party sources

http://vijaykarnataka.indiatimes.com/articleshow/18968557.cms?prtpage=1

http://vijaykarnataka.indiatimes.com/articleshow/20396555.cms

below the news papers is asking people to refer to kannada wikipedia http://vijaykarnataka.indiatimes.com/articleshow/16542535.cms?prtpage=1

Other info Shrikanthv (talk) 08:47, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 19:09, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

keep – one more here and lots of other on the big net (and in the local newspapers). Christian75 (talk) 09:52, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:54, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Upon a source search and review, the topic passes WP:GNG per:

– NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:05, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as notable per NA's sources. ansh666 04:53, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.