The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz Read! Talk! 02:36, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

KFRE-CA (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject does not meet the WP:GNG due to a lack of WP:SIGCOV. Let'srun (talk) 02:42, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and California. Let'srun (talk) 02:42, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: We no longer do articles sourced solely (whether directly or, seemingly in this case, implicitly) to FCC records — we need significant coverage. (The lack of any known programming information is a red flag — I suspect this was probably a rebroadcast of another station or 24/7 service, but again, we have nothing to go on here.) A remnant of the much looser "standards" of 2006. WCQuidditch 04:20, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete This station's legal history seems to have been a mess—and a non-notable one at that! It definitely was rebroadcasting KBFX-CD (then KBFX-CA) at one point, as Pappas owned it. I have one 2004 article from the Bakersfield Californian talking about transmitter issues with 58 and suggesting tuning to 27, even calling it "Fox 58 and 27". Sammi Brie (she/her • tc) 16:15, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.