Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jung-min Kim

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:33, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Jung-min Kim

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

At this points, fails WP:NFOOTY since he never played a match in a fully professional league. This might change, but as soon as it did not he is non-notable for us. Ymblanter (talk) 08:57, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. SeraphWiki (talk) 09:04, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Soccer-related deletion discussions. SeraphWiki (talk) 09:04, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. SeraphWiki (talk) 09:04, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Korea-related deletion discussions. SeraphWiki (talk) 09:04, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 10:26, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 10:26, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Austria-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 10:26, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Fails WP:NFOOTBALL and WP:GNG, maybe a case of WP:TOOSOON but until then article should be deleted. NZFC^(talk) 20:11, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Giant Snowman 10:53, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails NFOOTY as has not played or managed senior international football nor played or managed in a fully professional league. No indication that subject has garnered significant reliable coverage for any other achievements to satisfy GNG. Fenix down (talk) 15:48, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Pile-on delete Currently not notable. !dave 19:58, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fail WP:NFOOTBALL. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 15:35, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep See #1 of WP:NFOOTBALL. Kim Jung-min had played as one of 2014 AFC U-16 Championship and 2015 FIFA U-17 World Cup members. Thanks. --Garam (talk) 16:45, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
#1 of WP:NFOOTBALL is specifically about senior competitions.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:47, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Ymblanter: Sorry, I don't understand what you said well. Does that mean AFC U-16 and FIFA U-17 is not "senior competition"? Thanks. --Garam (talk) 17:24, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, this is exactly what I said.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:27, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Ymblanter: Then, what is an example of "senior competition"? In other words, is South Korean U17 team of 2015 FIFA U-17 World Cup not "Tier 1 International Match, as defined by FIFA"? Thanks. --Garam (talk) 17:40, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
No, my interpretation that if a footballer played an international match at the World Cup (including the qualification) or any continental cup (including preliminaries) he/she is notable, but U-17 does not give automatic notability. In this case, actually, playing a match in the Austrian league is probably the best bet, but it did not happen yet.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:47, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

And I find one article (title: Next Generation 2016: 60 of the best young talents in world football) in the Guardian about Kim Jung-min. Thanks. --Garam (talk) 18:00, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is much better, I would say one or more articles of this level, and we can probably keep the article.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:06, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.