Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Julie Corcoran

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 23:09, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Julie Corcoran

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article has been sitting in the NPP queue since January so notability appears unclear. I can’t find any sources other than what is already in the article as refs and external links. If this is sufficient for notability it seems quite borderline to me so bringing here for consensus. Mccapra (talk) 19:40, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 19:40, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 19:40, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 19:40, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

More newspaper articles found and being added to establish notability. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Agsmaoineamh1 (talk • contribs) 05:53, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Delete - I really did try here, went through a couple of archives, but I cannot find more than is presently here, and it’s not quite enough. One decent general article, and a range of lesser supports, is at least one good ref. too little. But if someone could find a little more. (Prior comment: I have reviewed for the local project, and rated, and tidied a little, and I see potential, but notability requires at least one more decent source. A dedicated article in one regional paper is a start, however, and I think I see more out there. I would not weight NPP queue time so much - I understand that if a new item is not captured in the first half-day, it can drift down the queue for months, due to review capacity issues. I will return with a !vote. (Added) For now, I see two gallery listings, plus Saatchi Online, and mentions of a third gallery, and at least two exhibitions participated in - and a self-written piece in the newspaper of record, The Irish Times, which says something, as they don't invite many to do that. I incline towards a Weak Keep.) SeoR (talk) 08:39, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - It's WP:TOOSOON for this artist, as after a WP:BEFORE search I found no records of museum shows, or notable museum collections. She has had a few exhibitions, one solo and a handful of group shows, but none are at notable venues. FYI Saatchi Online is user-generated content, meaning any artist can sign up to promote their work. All I find is one review, the rest are calendar listings, blogs, social media and more user-submitted content. The Irish Times piece mentioned about does not count towards notability because it is a primary source written by her; it's fine it is in the article, but we need reliable sources that have been written about her work. Maybe in a few years after she has had her work exhibited and reviewed widely there will be enough to sustain an article. Agsmaoineamh1, I noticed that you shot and uploaded the profile picture of her, just curious if are you connected to her in some way that should be disclosed? Netherzone (talk) 19:55, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. --- Possibly (talk) 20:22, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. --- Possibly (talk) 20:22, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete there seem to be no good sources. The shows are pretty inconsequential, for example in an "arts office". It is too soon for this article.--- Possibly (talk) 20:26, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I can find no sources that critically review her work. A feel-good story in the Independent about her marriage does not establish notability, nor do press releases from her gallery. Her own website which describes her as an "emerging Artist". The problem with emerging artists is that they have no career to speak of, no significant body of work and very little or nothing has been written about their work. Definitely to soon for an encyclopedia entry. Vexations (talk) 21:21, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Deletecan't find anything that suggests notability Devoke water 13:44, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.