Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jordyn Taylor

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 10:50, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Jordyn Taylor

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not pass WP:NMODEL or WP:NMUSIC. References are not third party independent reliable sources, and the only real mentions I can find are about being Trevor Noah's girlfriend. LovelyLillith (talk) 02:50, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 04:27, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 04:27, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Mexico-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 04:27, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

~~Comment.~~ Weak delete. Reasons to keep. She was signed to Interscope Records (2008-2010), a major label, which passes #5 in WP:NMUSIC. A lot of what is stated in the article is true, verifiable in many social media posts, but... Reasons to delete No reliable coverage from news sources, other than ones that talk about her relationship with Trevor Noah.

I think that it is definitely a possibility there are news articles about her fame on MySpace or her signing on Interscope, but I really can't find any, maybe someone else will find some. Awsomaw (talk) 13:38, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, #5 of WP:NMUSIC says if they released 2 albums on a major label. I will change to weak delete.Awsomaw (talk) 13:59, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 08:04, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep - I think this is on the border of notability. If the article was improved (currently too promotional) I think it could pass WP:NMODEL. Skirts89 (talk) 16:51, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Though there seems a weak consensus that NMUSIC isn't satisfied, NMODEL remains disputed
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nosebagbear (talk) 10:53, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Spamvanicruft. --Randykitty (talk) 14:56, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete She fails all crtierias of WP:NMUSIC, WP:GNG, and WP:NMODEL. She does not have a cult following or had unique contributions to modeling, she did not get a significant coverage from multiple reliable sources (interviews and blogs do not fall there). Not notable. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 15:30, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nomination. Subject should pass WP:NMODEL as a model, or WP:NMUSICIAN as a singer-songwriter, or at least WP:GNG as a real-estate agent. But doesn't. -The Gnome (talk) 06:01, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.