Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jonathan Sandridge

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:27, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Jonathan Sandridge

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable individual lacking Ghits and GNEWS of substance. Appears to fail WP:BIO. ttonyb (talk) 18:19, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:31, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:32, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non-notable.--Ethicoaestheticist (talk) 21:48, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not in agreement with deletion. Article was informative, the information listed within the article got me what I was searching for. ~~Gary Kurtz 11:12, 7 July 2010 (UTC)~~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.233.74.90 (talk • contribs) — 71.233.74.90 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

Comment – Above comment was made by IP Anon that has performed quite a few edits on article and appears to have a first person knowledge of the article's subject. ttonyb (talk) 14:55, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.