Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Castellucci

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 03:03, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

John Castellucci

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Castellucci does not pass WP:CRIME. Vic49 (talk) 19:49, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. Vic49 (talk) 19:55, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Vic49 (talk) 19:55, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Does not meet WP:CRIME. - DonCalo (talk) 22:26, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Part of a series of articles created by a dubious editor King Genovese. To be on the safe side, all articles created by King Genovese should be deleted. If they are really important and concern notable people they will be created by a credible editor again. - DonCalo (talk) 22:35, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Crisco 1492 (talk) 02:49, 18 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - One source with two mentions does not meet notability requirements. --Ted87 (talk) 18:00, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Does not meet WP:CRIME — Preceding unsigned comment added by SnakeDragon--SnakeDragon (talk) 18:47, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.