Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jiva Ayurveda

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz ^Humbug! 11:59, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Jiva Ayurveda

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject is failing WP:ORG. Even some contents of the article is written in the tone of advertisement. — CutestPenguin^Hangout 16:32, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. — CutestPenguin^Hangout 16:37, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. — Ascii002Talk Contribs GuestBook 23:50, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. — Ascii002Talk Contribs GuestBook 23:50, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:26, 12 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e decker ^talk 00:22, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:ORG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 23:13, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Relisting comment: On its way to deletion, but let us wait one more week--Ymblanter (talk) 08:03, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ymblanter (talk) 08:03, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Here ~~are~~ is a ~~couple~~ sources: ~~[1]~~, [2]. --Sammy1339 (talk) 18:38, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Sammy1339: none of your above reference is reliable, please find the reliable one. Thank you! — CutestPenguin^Hangout 18:41, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Cutest Penguin: I think these are reliable by the criteria of WP:NEWSORG, but I'll withdraw this claim if you can show evidence to the contrary. --Sammy1339 (talk) 18:49, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Sammy1339: http://www.apnnews.com/2014/05/12/jiva-ayurveda-launches-four-clinics-in-mumbai/ appears to be advertisement not the news. Please see WP:ORG for more information about the notability criteria for companies. — CutestPenguin^Hangout 18:58, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Cutest Penguin: Ah, looks like you're right. My bad. It's annoying they disguise ads as articles now. On the other hand the second one looks okay, but I don't have time right now to look into it in depth. --Sammy1339 (talk) 19:07, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Cutest Penguin: Alright, I'm not as familiar with Indian media as you probably are and so I have a hard time separating the wheat from the chaff, but there appears to be a fair number of sources for this company:[3]. Much as I hate to give a voice to quackery it does look like some of these articles are not just ads. --Sammy1339 (talk) 00:29, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Sammy1339: If you are not sure about the Indian Media or newspaper brands its better to take help of WP:INDAFD. Thanks! — CutestPenguin^Hangout 05:12, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails WP:CORP for lack of adequate coverage in reliable independent sources. --Bejnar (talk) 16:28, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.