Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jimmy Failla

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:32, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jimmy Failla

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There's very little to indicate notability. There is no substantive RS coverage of this person. There is some borderline RS coverage of minor incidents that Failla was mentioned in, but nothing substantive to build a Wikipedia article on. Most of the content is sourced to primary sources. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 21:27, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:42, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Entertainment-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:42, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:42, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:42, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:45, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:45, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:BIO per nom. SBKSPP (talk) 07:41, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:51, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

weak delete Seems to fail WP:BIO but his "snakes in a cab" pranks got some good coverage which may beat the notability threshold. GoldMiner24 (talk) 00:16, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
delete per non fails to meet notability guidelines. — Preceding unsigned comment added by WexfordUK (talk • contribs) 19:32, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.