Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeremy Fragrance

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎. As this is primarily due to low participation, there is no prejudice against speedy renomination. There is also no consensus as to whether socks make a good breakfast. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 06:17, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Jeremy Fragrance

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

YouTube videos, deprecated sources, blogging sites. Show me a secondary source and not only will I change my position that this so-called entrepreneur fails WP:GNG I will eat my own socks live on YouTube. Expressive101 (talk) 10:04, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Internet, and Germany. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:10, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

GQ did a piece on him just a few months ago. Must be somewhat notable: https://www.gq.com/story/jeremy-fragrance-tiktok-interview Griseo veritas (talk) 10:14, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

~~Delete~~ Interviews aren't secondary sources, they're primary sources, sorry.Expressive101 (talk) 11:00, 16 September 2023 (UTC) (Your deletion nominaion is considered your Delete vote. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:02, 7 October 2023 (UTC))[reply]

Comment Sourcing used in the article is not proving helpful, but this individual seems to have had a TV show on German Tv [1], so they might meet notability. Wee bit of coverage here: [2] Oaktree b (talk) 23:33, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep Several articles in Swiss German sources, he was on a version of Big Brother [3]. This seems helpful [4]. Oaktree b (talk) 23:37, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:17, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

He's considered a (very) minor celebrity in Germany. Although I'm personally not a fan, I'd argue that he is a person of public interest and meets the notability criteria. Kitzing (talk) 23:33, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:39, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - there seems to be enough coverage and profiles of the subject to indicate notability. - Indefensible (talk) 05:00, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.