- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Star Mississippi 17:43, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Jade Slack (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A tragic event sure, but not a notable one. Not the first child to discover drugs and die from them, nor the last. While yes it got a bit of national coverage, it was a flash in the pan tragic news story with no long reaching consequences outside of the immediate family. Can't seem to find any section in WP:BIO that would explain a notability that this would pass. Additionally, was created by a prolific sock-puppeter thought that is secondary to the notability issue. Canterbury Tail talk 17:51, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 18:31, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 18:31, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 18:31, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: Non-notable crime? It's basically a poisoning, no matter how tragic, it's somewhat routine. No lasting effects, no changes in laws or packaging standards. Largely a memorial page. Oaktree b (talk) 23:26, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete - For what it's worth, I'm from the area and unfortunately I doubt many would recognise this from the victim's name alone anymore. Beyond the issue of notability, how much of the article would even be suitable to keep? Only three of the five references are still online, leaving most of the content floating. 2A02:C7C:9838:5700:25D7:40CF:9A18:3671 (talk) 08:01, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.