Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jacqui Irwin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Coffee // have a cup // essay // 20:42, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Jacqui Irwin

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:POLITICIAN because she doesn't have widespread coverage as a local politician; all Google News hits except for one are voter's guide type non-neutral sources from the Ventura County Star, doesn't pass WP:GNG; as an aside, is an unsourced BLP Go Phightins! 20:48, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:12, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:12, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or redirect to Thousand Oaks, California. The mayor or city councilperson of a town like Thousand Oaks does not qualify under WP:POLITICIAN, and I could not find significant independent coverage about her as needed for WP:ANYBIO. The article smells strongly of having been written by one of her kids (who are all named in the article, along with the helpful detail that "Jacqui Irwin has the largest campaign signs in town.") --MelanieN (talk) 21:26, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete rather than redirect. Without a reliable source there is no basis for a redirect. Stuartyeates (talk) 22:19, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.