Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/J. Luke Bennecke

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:12, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

J. Luke Bennecke

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article does not establish notability. Possible self-promotion by author? Patrick J. Welsh (talk) 19:10, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Businesspeople, Engineering, Transportation, California, and Nevada. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:22, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Very likely PROMO, all sourcing I find seems to be book signings or on BookTrib, which isn't RS. No critical reviews of their novels found. Oaktree b (talk) 20:46, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - not notable and likely written for money by BheekAam along with other articles. The book won Feathered Quill awards but I'm not sure they're sufficient to qualify for notability as an author; here's more info about Feather Quill: [1][2]

See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andy Daro for another article by the same editor.

--A. B. ^{(talk • contribs • global count)} 23:43, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also:

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trance Fury (2nd nomination)

--A. B. ^{(talk • contribs • global count)} 03:09, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not notable and few RS citations or recognition. Go4thProsper (talk) 21:49, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Only one source, with no sigcov and the feathered quill award doesn't exactly seem prestigious enough to satisfy any alternative criteria. ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 22:47, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:GNG and his only award is not notability-lending. Appears to wear many hats, but isn't notable in any of them. Best, GPL93 (talk) 11:54, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete; poorly executed UPE, if they are notable WP:TNT but I don't think they are anyway. ☆ Bri (talk) 18:43, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Only one source provided, and certainly promotional. HarukaAmaranth ^春 _香 19:10, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not notable and few RS citations or recognition.--VViking_TalkEdits 14:19, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.