Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Islam in Greenland (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to ~~Islam in Greenland~~Religion in Greenland. Pretty clear consensus that the article needs to be gotten rid of, but it's not so clear if deletion or merge is the preferred outcome and most arguments are not terribly specific as to why a particular outcome would be preferred. The (few) arguments for deletion are that the sourcing is probably too sparse for merging any content over. The (equally few) arguments for merge is that people might want to find out about the topic. On balance, it appears that a redirect might be the best way to satisfy both arguments. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 10:20, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Amended the close, as I redirected to the wrong target in the original version. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 13:23, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Islam in Greenland

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This was deleted back in 2006 and it appears the rationale then is still as valid now.

(I would tag this for G4 but I wanted to play it safe since I can't see the deleted page on Deletionpedia, though I doubt it's very different from what it is now.) – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 07:50, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 07:50, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Denmark-related deletion discussions. – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 07:50, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Definitely not a notable topic, given the extremely limited number of Muslims in Greenland. It almost seems the lack of Muslims in Greenland is more notable than the Muslims in Greenland, but that fact can easily be covered in a brief sentence in another article about Greenland. A standalone article is as unnecessary today as it was in 2006. Mz7 (talk) 08:24, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or merge Trivial information not worthy of an article. sixtynine ^{• whaddya want? •} 08:43, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete- I too think that it is a highly unqualified topic to be nominated as a subject for an article. This fact can easily be mentioned in the Greenland main page. DishitaBhowmik 10:39, 26 January 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:27, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Religion in Greenland. The topic is one that raises some obvious questions that people may come to Wikipedia to find answers for.--Jahaza (talk) 16:31, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Religion in Greenland. There is not enough material for the topic to merit its own separate article. Tayi Arajakate (talk) 17:11, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Religion in Greenland, although since the first source has "Blog" in it's name, it's probably not WP:RS and shouldn't be merged over. Hog Farm (talk) 02:51, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Religion in Greenland Iamreallygoodatcheckers (talk) 05:20, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete We do not need a religion article that mentions one not notable person.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:02, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with Religion in Greenland. Horse Eye Jack (talk) 20:51, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or Merege I am leaning towards delete as there are most likely not enough sources to accurately verify this. Also it seems kind of self prommotional. 8Lizard^{talk to me!!!} 11:35, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Merge as suggested; see WP:ODD. Bearian (talk) 21:30, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.