Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International Nuclear Safety Center

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and redirect to Argonne National Laboratory. Randykitty (talk) 14:44, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

International Nuclear Safety Center

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

probably never existed, see Wikipedia:Reference_desk/Science#What_happened_to_the_INSC.3F Ysangkok (talk) 18:16, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A quick glance to cited “references” and instances of it being mentioned at Special:WhatLinksHere/International Nuclear Safety Center makes it probable that it was just made up one day.--The Theosophist (talk) 23:04, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

On a second thought, there is this page here.--The Theosophist (talk) 23:06, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note how there are at least two other real organizations named INSC, I recently added links for them at the disambiguation page. The Instrument is established by EU regulation, it might be notable. I do not think the Council is, it looks to be just a random bunch of people. An organization named INSAG exists (and is mentioned on IAEA pages), and I believe that it does what the page for the subject of this AfD would like to have us believe. --Ysangkok (talk) 08:13, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Argonne National Laboratory. From the limited material available on-line, it appears to have existed (briefly) in the 1990's as a name for a department of the laboratory, but apparently didn't make much of an impact on the world of nuclear safety in general, and probably doesn't deserve its own article. Tevildo (talk) 18:08, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:17, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:17, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:17, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95 ^Talk 13:38, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.