Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International Client's day

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎. Star Mississippi 16:23, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

International Client's day (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Spam. Previously deleted. Fails WP:N, WP:NCORP. Cabrils (talk) 00:42, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 07:42, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Seimas of the Republic of Lithuania recognized the specified day as an "unofficial holiday" (documents are available at the links: https://e-seimas.lrs.lt/portal/legalAct/lt/TAP/0b62f320d78011e8820ea019e5d9ad04?jfwid=176mwooltn, https://e-seimas.lrs.lt/portal/legalAct/lt/TAK/6f46c46317e111e9bd28d9a28a9e9ad9). The celebration of International Client's Day is described in sources from different countries and in various languages: https://news.am/arm/news/566815.html?fbclid=IwAR0A8GZWETrm_KfOeBFeC3rSTewY5VLAphG2KChKIX9-srK7ZGwlqOj8CI4, https://www.ucreative.com/offbeat/customers-or-clients-some-thoughts-on-clients-day/?fbclid=IwAR2HSsWn8BtRV4ps8kkgQhj0zv4Bi51QJU7j_K46UtK8ll3WQIwX_oz3WsU, https://klaipeda.diena.lt/dienrastis/ivairenybes/klaipedietis-siekia-iteisinti-tarptautine-kliento-diena-268087/www-2sim-lt/komentarai#.UtT1As-IqM8, https://webplus.info/index.php?page=340&holiday=1286&fbclid=IwAR04nuRofMJS9j_PQAS8JNH9aj8kR4a-kvg3SLuK4AqTKp6agg52I-9yV4I, https://www.freepressjournal.in/business/international-clients-day-the-importance-of-appreciating-and-reassuring-clients-amidst-economic-headwinds. These sources adhere to Wikipedia’s rules, as they are independent, the published information is reviewed, and the subject of the articles is described without promotion, providing sufficient information from a neutral standpoint. The request in response to this comment is to provide arguments for why and based on which points the argumentation is considered sufficient or insufficient for recognizing International Client’s Day as significant according to Wikipedia rules. Profis (talk) 08:01, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.