Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Intensify

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. WP:NPASR – Juliancolton | ^Talk 02:05, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Intensify

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about an album that has not met any notability criteria for albums and recordings. - TheMagnificentist 11:18, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep on the assumption that the claim to hit #61 in the UK album charts can be verified by a source such as British Hit Singles & Albums Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 11:50, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It is verified by the UK Official Charts Company Bennv3771 (talk) 15:02, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete We have too many non-notable albums like this cluttering up our name space. Andrew D. (talk) 15:54, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 06:42, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk|c|em) 12:07, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:19, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Winged Blades^Godric 07:17, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.