Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Innovative Emergency Management
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 23:43, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Innovative Emergency Management (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Half the sources are the company itself. Democracy Now! is marginally reliable, whilst all the remaining ones are fairly routine. Online search does not reveal any non-routine coverage, and the article reads as promotional. Bremps... 00:30, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Bremps... 00:30, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 20:19, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 00:28, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.