Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/InnoPath Software
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:34, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- InnoPath Software (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Appears to be a vendor of software the third party references are poor unclear on its notability, reads more like a promotion for the company. This appears to have been nominated before and result was delete. I'm not sure if you have to do this differently in this case. Sorry if I've done this wrong. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Log/2005_October_22#Innopath Holkingers (talk) 08:40, 2 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Week keep the article does leave a lot to be desired, but I think the the company in itself is notable. Google News lists 436 news items for the company,[1] far above out normal notability requirements. --Salix (talk): 13:00, 2 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm happy to withdraw my nomination, thanks for the Google news link, I hadn't expanded the results - I've learned something anyway. Holkingers (talk) 13:13, 2 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:03, 2 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | Talk 00:54, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply] - The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.