Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/How To scam for headshots

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. WP:SNOW -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:15, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

How To scam for headshots

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm not even sure what this article is about. Erpert (let's talk about it) 20:42, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Delete, speedy if possible. We aren't a howto (that's for Wikihow), and moreover, this is blatantly created by somebody who apparently wanted what he saw as a web host - which we are not. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 20:44, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Even if this was a how-to type of site, there is no way this info will ever be useful to a large number of readers or verifiable. —Soap— 21:10, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Snow delete. WP:NOTHOW, WP:NOTBLOG, WP:NOT#OR. — Rankiri (talk) 21:19, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The title says it all: violation of WP:NOT#HOWTO. -- Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 21:26, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete. I don't see any reason why this should not be deleted speedily. --Wicked247 (talk) 22:31, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Only qualifier I see at this point is WP:SNOW. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 22:34, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete - violation of WP:NOT#HOWTO, should be closed per WP:SNOW. December21st2012Freak ^{Happy St. Patrick's Day!} 22:37, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete- this violates WP:No original research and is probably a violation of the TOS which states you may not "Harass, threaten, embarrass, or cause distress or discomfort upon another user..."Smallman12q (talk) 00:07, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This needed {{db-nonsense}} not AfD. Johnuniq (talk) 00:29, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I'll try that. Erpert (let's talk about it) 05:47, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Snow Delete Per WP:NOT. RadManCF ☢ open frequency 00:31, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
What a mockery of procedure. Speedy Delete, of course.--WaltCip (talk) 04:42, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.