Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hobart Bus Station

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Although a rename to Hobart Bus Mall sounds like it is in order. kelapstick^(bainuu) 15:41, 25 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hobart Bus Station

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable bus station - There's nothing at all on Google or High Beam. Fails GNG –Davey2010^Talk 16:43, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Grahame (talk) 08:28, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and possibly rename - central public transport station in an Australian capital city, which in my opinion automatically grants notability. It possibly has the significance of a central train station since Hobart has no trains or trams. Finally: the article name seems to be a poor choice. I'm not from Hobart, but a quick google suggests "Hobart Bus Mall" is the common name, while "Hobart City" is the official name on the timetables. So it should probably be renamed to one of them. Adpete (talk) 23:36, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:06, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and rename Hobart Bus Mall. just as adpete said southern Tasmania has nothing but busses, no trams or trains. They are doing a large remodel too on the bus mall. [1] Most exciting, assaults on Taz bus drivers are down 50%! [2] Alec Station (talk) 11:54, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Just a street with bus stops on it. Not a proper bus station. There are thousands of the former in cities all over the world; they don't have articles. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:15, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It's about the transit mall which is significant (and not a station). It is being given a $2million revitalisation project that is very significant.[3] [4] Alec Station (talk) 03:45, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. I've looked at it on Google Streetview. It's just a few bus stops on a street. I've seen larger bus stations in small towns in Europe. -- Necrothesp (talk) 09:34, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95 ^Talk 15:57, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95 ^Talk 15:38, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Transport_in_Hobart#Public_Transport. Not notable, not interesting, but information on the bus system as a whole belongs at the target. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 04:50, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per User:Alec Station's references. The development has received significant coverage in multiple independent sources, so the subject passes WP:GNG. St Anselm (talk) 09:55, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 15:19, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Transport_in_Hobart#Public_Transport. No sources verify anything important or significant beyond the mere existence and function of this bus station. AadaamS (talk) 18:11, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.